Ask Question
8 July, 05:53

Marsha has met with two attorneys. Attorney A works at a large prominent law firm and charges a lower hourly fee, has little experience in Marsha's area of business and takes several days to return phone calls. Attorney B charges a slightly higher hourly rate, has direct experience in Marsha's area of business and replies promptly. Marsha should hire:a. Attorney A because of the firm's reputation

b. Attorney A because it is cheaper

c. Attorney B because this person is a better fit for Marsha's needs

d. None of these are correct

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 8 July, 06:21
    0
    c. Attorney B because this person is a better fit for Marsha's needs.

    Explanation:

    Attorney B is the better option because he has direct experience in Marsha's area of business and will be more focused on delivering results. Unlike Attorney A that works in a big firm, does not have experience in Marsha's business, and does not respond to her calls.

    Despite the slightly higher hourly rate by Attorney B he is the better option because the probability that he will deliver results is high.

    Attorney A may be cheaper but due to his inexperience and lack of commitment to the case he stands the chance of loosing the case. Resulting in even higher loss.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Marsha has met with two attorneys. Attorney A works at a large prominent law firm and charges a lower hourly fee, has little experience in ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers