In january 2011, a judge issued a verdict in a case brought by the national coalition for men against the century supper club. the men were protesting the club's "ladies night" policy that charged men $20 for entry while allowing women to enter for free. this case, which went back and forth among appeals courts for many years, was interesting because it was based on reverse discrimination: men were demanding equal treatment rather than women. this news event refers to a case of discrimination. one logical outcome of this case would be: for the century supper club to refund the money of the men who attended "ladies nights" at the club for the century supper club to be charged with unequal employment opportunities for the men to receive an affirmative action settlement

Question

Guest

Business

22 January, 04:09

In january 2011, a judge issued a verdict in a case brought by the national coalition for men against the century supper club. the men were protesting the club's "ladies night" policy that charged men $20 for entry while allowing women to enter for free. this case, which went back and forth among appeals courts for many years, was interesting because it was based on reverse discrimination: men were demanding equal treatment rather than women. this news event refers to a case of discrimination. one logical outcome of this case would be: for the century supper club to refund the money of the men who attended "ladies nights" at the club for the century supper club to be charged with unequal employment opportunities for the men to receive an affirmative action settlement

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Pitts · Answer 1

It is indeed discrimination against the men who entered the club on ladies' night and were forced to pay to enter. The men should be refunded by the supper club and the supper club should change their policy on ladies' night.