Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results? A. Peer review makes the experiment repeatable. B. Peer review is necessary for the scientific method to be followed. C. Peer review keeps the data from being biased. D. Peer review makes the results more reliable.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results? A. Peer review makes the experiment repeatable. B. Peer review is ...” in 📗 Chemistry if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
an element is a mixture of two isotopes. one isotope has an atomic mass of 34.96885 amu and has an abundance of 75.53%. The other isotope has an atomic mass of 36.96590 amu. Calculate the average atomic mass and identify the element?
Answers (1)
True or false table salt is an example of a substance
Answers (1)
What's the relationship between the hours of daylight and the temperature
Answers (1)
What is the molarity of a solution of nitric acid if 0.283 g of barium hydroxide is required to neutralize 20.00 mL of nitric acid?
Answers (1)
What characterizes the fields in Bangkok, Thailand?
Answers (1)
New Questions in Chemistry
A sample of methane gas occupies 4.50 gallons at a temperature of 80.0 F. If the pressure is held constant, what will be the volume of the gas at 100. degrees C?
Answers (1)
Jack wants to know if it takes longer for warm water to freeze into ice cubes than cold water, so he performed the following experiment. Jack placed 50 mL of water in the refrigerator and allowed it to cool to a temperature of 4°C.
Answers (1)
How to calculate average concentration
Answers (1)
Suppose that you measure a pen to be 10.5 cm long. Convert this to meters.
Answers (1)
How are amounts of hydrogen and oxygen gas made from the electrolytic decomposition of water related to the chemical formula of water?
Answers (1)