Ask Question
30 September, 23:24

The energy needed to remove one electron from a gaseous potassium atom is only about two-thirds as much as that needed to remove one electron from a gaseous calcium atom, yet nearly three times as much energy as that needed to remove one electron from K1 as from Ca1. What expla - nation can you give for this contrast?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 30 September, 23:47
    0
    Ionization of K + will affect the inert gas core of the atom while ionization of Ca + will not.

    Explanation:

    Potassium loses one electron in its outermost shell to become K + it now has an inert or noble gas electron configuration; it is not quite energetically costly to ionize potassium.

    Removing an electron from K + removes an electron from a closed shell (inert gas configuration) since its outermost shell now contains exactly eight electrons. However, losing an electron from Ca + gives Ca2+, which now has a closed shell or inert gas configuration
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The energy needed to remove one electron from a gaseous potassium atom is only about two-thirds as much as that needed to remove one ...” in 📗 Chemistry if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers