How does a scientist critique another scientist's conclusion?
A. By ignoring the first scientists date
B. By Criticizing the scientist's personal beliefs
C. By performing more experiments
D. By reading secondary sources
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “How does a scientist critique another scientist's conclusion? A. By ignoring the first scientists date B. By Criticizing the scientist's ...” in 📗 Chemistry if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How to identify oxidation half-reaction and reduction half-reaction in a redox equation? explain
Answers (1)
Write a paragraph that includes the following information: In general, what is the scientific method? What are the basic steps to the scientific method? How did Johannes Kepler put the scientific method to use?
Answers (1)
To neutralize 1.65g LiOH, how much. 150 M HCl would be needed
Answers (1)
Na3X, Enter the group number of X?
Answers (1)
How many electrons are contained in a co3 + ion
Answers (1)
New Questions in Chemistry
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) gas and liquid water (H2O) react to form aqueous nitric acid (HNO3) and nitrogen monoxide (NO) gas. Suppose you have 5.0 mol of NO2 and 11.0 mol of H2O in a reactor. Suppose as much as possible of the NO2 reacts.
Answers (1)
How long does it take the Earth to rotation and revive
Answers (2)
What is Charles' law formula?
Answers (1)
Which stars have the highest absolute brightness? Select one: a. Supergiants b. Giants c. Yellow stars d. Dwarfs
Answers (1)
What volume would 3.01•1023 molecules of oxygen gas occupy at STP?
Answers (1)