Ask Question
9 April, 00:33

After Hurricane Katrina there was considerable public outrage that many of the properties were not insured against flooding although they were insured against wind damage. What might explain these different approaches to insurance? A. Predatory insurance policies. B. The risk of flood damage is potentially diversifiable but the risk of wind damage is not. C. The risk of wind damage is potentially diversifiable but the risk of flooding is not. D. Neither the risk of wind damage or the risk of flooding is diversifiable.

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 9 April, 00:37
    0
    Indeed, B is the answer
  2. 9 April, 00:49
    0
    I would say B is the answer
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “After Hurricane Katrina there was considerable public outrage that many of the properties were not insured against flooding although they ...” in 📗 Engineering if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers