Ask Question
25 August, 07:11

I wanted to stay angry with him, even though my anger was

acid, eating away at my soul. It was my comfort, my

security, to know that I had it. I controlled it; I decided

whether to keep it or to let it go. And I kept it. And, oh, how

it burned.

How does the metaphor in this passage most clearly support the author's

purpose?

O A. It exaggerates the dangers of acid in order to make anger seem

like a bad habit to hold on to.

B. It makes the acid seem like a peer to the speaker to show that it

can take on a life of its own.

O C. It compares anger to acid to show how letting it go can bring

healing and restoration.

D. It makes anger seem like acid that can cause people physical pain

and permanent damage if they hold on to it.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 25 August, 07:23
    0
    I believe its c.

    Explanation:

    They mention how holding on to the metaphorical acid which represented the person's anger burned. Although, keeping the anger bottled up caused the person comfort, it caused them pain just as well. Now since the acid is metaphorical, it can't physically hurt the person so it cant be D (The other choice I was torn between). They also mention how the acid ate away the persons soul in a way (Still not mentioning anything about physical pain.)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “I wanted to stay angry with him, even though my anger was acid, eating away at my soul. It was my comfort, my security, to know that I had ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers