The nature versus nurture debate is largely settled because most

psychologists believe that both genes and environment play a part in

development. Which of these might be an example of where the debate might

not be resolved?

O

A. Whether the environment has an effect on a person's ability to

speak

B. Whether genes have an effect on a person's size

C. Whether the environment has an effect on an infant's

temperament

O

D. Whether some forms of cancer have genetic causes

Question

Linda Moses

English

5 February, 17:10

The nature versus nurture debate is largely settled because most

psychologists believe that both genes and environment play a part in

development. Which of these might be an example of where the debate might

not be resolved?

O

A. Whether the environment has an effect on a person's ability to

speak

B. Whether genes have an effect on a person's size

C. Whether the environment has an effect on an infant's

temperament

O

D. Whether some forms of cancer have genetic causes

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Jaydon Cabrera · Answer 1

Answer: (D) whether some forms of cancer have genetic causes

Explanation:

I just did it on APEX; )

Alexus Dean · Answer 2

D. Whether some forms of cancer have genetic causes.

Explanation:

The nature vs. nurture debate is one of the most important discussions in the social sciences. This debate attempts to definitely establish whether genetics or lifestyle and environment play a larger role in the development of a person. It is likely that both of these influences play a role. However, the situation is unclear when it comes to cancer. While we know that some habits can increase your risk of cancer (sunbathing excessively, smoking, etc.), it is still unclear to what extent some forms of cancer are caused by genetics.