Perris drafts this paragraph for his analysis

James Cross Giblin, in The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, effectively explains the struggle to understand the Rosetta Stone using multiple examples of scholars who attempted to decipher it. Giblin details the failed attempts of Kircher, who "let his imagination run wild," as well as the successes of Champollion, who was proven to be "correct without any doubt."

How does Perris present suitable evidence for his analysis?

A. Perris avoids stating the chronological order in which the scholars studied the stone.

B. Perris provides descriptive details about the Rosetta Stone.

C. Perris quotes textual evidence that supports his thesis.

D. Perris avoids paraphrasing important ideas that are presented in the text about the stone.

Question

Emmett

English

10 July, 13:55

Perris drafts this paragraph for his analysis

James Cross Giblin, in The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone, effectively explains the struggle to understand the Rosetta Stone using multiple examples of scholars who attempted to decipher it. Giblin details the failed attempts of Kircher, who "let his imagination run wild," as well as the successes of Champollion, who was proven to be "correct without any doubt."

How does Perris present suitable evidence for his analysis?

A. Perris avoids stating the chronological order in which the scholars studied the stone.

B. Perris provides descriptive details about the Rosetta Stone.

C. Perris quotes textual evidence that supports his thesis.

D. Perris avoids paraphrasing important ideas that are presented in the text about the stone.

+1

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Izabella Bowen · Answer 1

C. Perris quotes textual evidence that supports his thesis.

Explanation:

i did it i got a 98 i got it right

Zariah Santos · Answer 2

The correct answer is C. Perris quotes textual evidence that supports his thesis.

The analysis Parris is trying to make is that it's difficult to decipher the Rosetta Stone. To support this idea, he uses details from the text to explain how difficult it is - by mentioning scholars that have failed, despite their varying methods.