Ask Question
16 April, 02:17

Read the passage.

And this is no small distinction. It is the whole distinction in a man. You cannot serve two masters; You must serve one or the other. If your work is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master.

Which best evaluates the reasoning in the passage?

A) The reasoning is not sound; the author uses an either-or argument

B) The reasoning is not sound; the author relies on name-calling

C) The reasoning is not sound; the author uses circular logic

D) The reasoning is not sound; the author relies on overgenerlization

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 16 April, 02:29
    0
    Answer is C ...
  2. 16 April, 02:43
    0
    I think the answer is C ...
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Read the passage. And this is no small distinction. It is the whole distinction in a man. You cannot serve two masters; You must serve one ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers