When an argument appeals to logic and an author provides evidence and statistics to support

his or her claim, that evidence can sometimes be refuted and proven wrong. Does that mean

that appeals to ethos and pathos are better to use?

Question

Joslyn Small

English

23 August, 12:36

When an argument appeals to logic and an author provides evidence and statistics to support

his or her claim, that evidence can sometimes be refuted and proven wrong. Does that mean

that appeals to ethos and pathos are better to use?

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Marisol Miranda · Answer 1

Ethos

Explanation:

I associate ''Ethos'' with the word ethics and when you refute someones arguments you are using intelligence rather than playing with their feelings which would be ''pathos''

When an argument appeals to logic and an author provides evidence and statistics to supporthis or her claim, that evidence can sometimes be refuted and proven wrong. Does that meanthat appeals to ethos and pathos are better to use?

When an argument appeals to logic and an author provides evidence and statistics to support

his or her claim, that evidence can sometimes be refuted and proven wrong. Does that mean

that appeals to ethos and pathos are better to use?