There must be extraordinary things to discover and understand in space. I get that. But, what is our rush? Wouldn't our energy be better spent trying to solve so many other problems that plague mankind where we live today? There is truly no shortage of these relatively local kinds of problems. Just contemplate with me what those leading scientists and innovative thinkers, who spend all their time contemplating the existence of universes, galaxies, and other worlds currently beyond our reach, could accomplish if they turned their telescopes toward home?

What detail do both authors include?

Question

John Moses

English

13 August, 10:16

There must be extraordinary things to discover and understand in space. I get that. But, what is our rush? Wouldn't our energy be better spent trying to solve so many other problems that plague mankind where we live today? There is truly no shortage of these relatively local kinds of problems. Just contemplate with me what those leading scientists and innovative thinkers, who spend all their time contemplating the existence of universes, galaxies, and other worlds currently beyond our reach, could accomplish if they turned their telescopes toward home?

What detail do both authors include?

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jaylen Hensley · Answer 1

Answer:A biology investigation usually starts with an observation-that is, something that catches the biologist's attention. For instance, a cancer biologist might notice that a certain kind of cancer can't be treated with chemotherapy and wonder why this is the case. A marine ecologist, seeing that the coral reefs of her field sites are bleaching-turning white-might set out to understand why.