Ask Question
EnglishEnglish
23 April, 17:01

Pros and cons of editorial anonymity on Wikipedia

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 23 April, 17:06
    0
    Pros

    it keeps the editors safe

    if they make a mistake people can't come after them

    people cannot communicate with them over subjects they have written about

    cons

    people can't give feedback to let them know if it is incorrect

    editors can make things up on a page and fool many people
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Pros and cons of editorial anonymity on Wikipedia ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Colonists were denied a fair trial by jury because of Great Britain's rule. Which of the following amendments to the Bill of Rights gave colonists the right to a trial by jury?
Answers (1)
What is the meaning of the root touch up in words like topographer and topographic Alone Highest Go Place
Answers (1)
Since there is so much food here, we can't not find something to eat.
Answers (1)
She was fickle and her friendships which both forms and ended abruptly choose the word or phrase that best matches the word and italics
Answers (1)
So anybody read the Templeton twins?
Answers (1)
New Questions in English
The narrator is motivated by a desire for what evidence in the text best supports this conclusion
Answers (2)
Do you need to speak the same language well to make friends with someone? Why? Why not?
Answers (1)
The evidence/support in a body paragraph should be Select one: a. random. b. unclear c. unified. d. irrelevant.
Answers (2)
Who was the author of the poem london and other romantic protests against the effects of industrial urban life on children and the poor?
Answers (1)
Oedipus Summary. What does the seer tell Oedipus to do?
Answers (1)
Home » English » Pros and cons of editorial anonymity on Wikipedia
Sign Up Forgot Password?