Ask Question
19 July, 02:32

In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 19 July, 02:35
    0
    Hi

    The term "hero" has a series of implications that transcend the role of "protagonist" of the novel. The hero of the medieval world is a model of those values that society understands as positive. The hero potentially embodies virtues to which men aspire at every moment. The link between heroic values and social values is essential to understand the transformation that occurs when arriving at the contemporary era. For a hero to show, society must have a degree of cohesion enough to have recognized and common values. Without values there is no hero. The hero is always a proposal, an embodiment of ideals. The status of hero had as much of his actions as of the value that others grant him those actions. This allows the heroic dimension to vary in each given historical situation of the prevailing values. Regardless of the degree of real presence of the virtues in a society, it must have a goal towards which it is directed or towards which it can be directed.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. Write a ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers