Ask Question
17 September, 07:51

In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?

A. Readers of john milton's paradise lost often search for a hero in the form of a character, which is fruitless.

B. Iku saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of epics, but its a common flaw to call the first the greatest?

C. Alex fernandez's interpretation of J. D. Salinger's the catcher in the rye is interesting but ultimately flawed.

D. Henry taylor's argument seems to be developeing but his essay is an unfinished thesis, not a published article.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 17 September, 08:17
    0
    I would go with B, I do not for sure know the answer but that is the one that seems to make the most sense
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source? A. Readers of john milton's paradise ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers