Which sentence should be revised to make this summary more objective? [1] Thomas Paine states that to talk of friendship with Britain is unwise. [2] Relations between the countries are steadily declining, and he is certain that they will not improve. [3] Paine concludes that reconciliation is not possible because some injuries are unforgivable. [4] Paine's logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day.

Question

Jan Wiley

English

10 October, 01:49

Which sentence should be revised to make this summary more objective? [1] Thomas Paine states that to talk of friendship with Britain is unwise. [2] Relations between the countries are steadily declining, and he is certain that they will not improve. [3] Paine concludes that reconciliation is not possible because some injuries are unforgivable. [4] Paine's logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Damari Vazquez · Answer 1

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "[4] Paine’s logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day." This is the sentence that should be revised to make this summary more objective