Ask Question
15 July, 14:45

Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr?

A.

Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters.

B.

Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.

C.

Tennessee had refused to create districts that were the same shape.

D.

Tennessee had refused to take part in the national census.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 15 July, 15:07
    0
    B. Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr? A. Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers