Explain how Levitt and Dubner's argument effectively uses logical, concrete evidence to arrive at conclusions about morality. Address how well reasoning and evidence are used.

Their claim about cheating existing in high-incentive situationsthe facts they present about sumo and the bagel businesstheir use of statistical evidencetheir use of different examples (sumo and bagels) in their evidence their overall use of inductive reasoning to arrive at a generalization about morality