Ask Question
26 December, 01:18

Now, I have no means of totally disproving such charges as this which the Judge makes. A man cannot prove a negative; but he has a right to claim, that when a man makes an affirmative charge, he must offer some proof to show the truth of what he says. I certainly cannot introduce testimony to show the negative about things, but I have a right to claim that if a man says he knows a thing, then he must show how he knows it. I always have a right to claim this, and it is not satisfactory to me that he may be "conscientious" on the subject.

Does the author use a consistent tone in the passage?

A. No, the author switches from casual to formal diction.

B. No, the author switches from subjective to condescending diction.

C. Yes, the author uses diction that is academic and formal.

D. Yes, the author uses diction that is lighthearted and informal.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 26 December, 01:34
    0
    Now, it is harder to prove a uniform style than it is to prove a varied one: for the latter, one only needs to cite contrasting examples.

    However, the fact that I don't see examples like that is an argument that the style is actually uniform; it's quite formal and it lacks any informal expressions.

    I would then say that the best answer is the following:

    C. Yes, the author uses diction that is academic and formal.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Now, I have no means of totally disproving such charges as this which the Judge makes. A man cannot prove a negative; but he has a right to ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers