Ask Question
2 September, 03:58

Read the passage and choose the best answer to the question.

Division 1 college athletes should be paid a small salary. Many college athletes have no money for daily life. Their scholarships cover housing, meals, and tuition, but they need money for other things. What if they need shampoo or a new pair of jeans? They often don't have time to work because of their practices and games. Also, they may not be allowed to work part-time because of their scholarships. College sports bring in lots of money for the schools, so the players should get some of that.

Which piece of evidence best challenges the argument?

The 2 percent of high school grads playing Division 1 sports already get a free education.

Paying college athletes makes them professionals, not amateurs.

Colleges and universities could bid on players, giving wealthy schools an advantage.

College students could be irresponsible with any money they're paid.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 2 September, 04:08
    0
    It's A: the 2% of high school grads playing division one sports already get free education

    Explanation:

    Just did it on e2020
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Read the passage and choose the best answer to the question. Division 1 college athletes should be paid a small salary. Many college ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers