Which statement explains the reasoning and evidence

used to support the claim that a principality created by

the people is easier to rule?

The argument uses deductive reasoning and

logical evidence in the form of a historical example

to support the claim.

The argument relies on logical evidence in the form

of a historical example to draw a general conclusion

that supports the claim.

The argument uses both deductive and inductive

reasoning that relies on anecdotal evidence to

support the claim.

The argument presents empirical evidence in the

form of statistics to form deductive reasoning and support the claim.

Question

Adrienne Gill

English

Today, 00:18

Which statement explains the reasoning and evidence

used to support the claim that a principality created by

the people is easier to rule?

The argument uses deductive reasoning and

logical evidence in the form of a historical example

to support the claim.

The argument relies on logical evidence in the form

of a historical example to draw a general conclusion

that supports the claim.

The argument uses both deductive and inductive

reasoning that relies on anecdotal evidence to

support the claim.

The argument presents empirical evidence in the

form of statistics to form deductive reasoning and support the claim.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Caiden · Answer 1

The argument uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.

Explanation:

The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.