Ask Question
17 December, 01:05

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 17 December, 01:17
    0
    The characters are talking animals. Any other option would be logical and easy to explain, but talking animals don't exist unless you consider a parrot. Nonetheless, the other options are logical and realistic while the last option is not at all realistic. Most children's books are not realistic.
  2. 17 December, 01:33
    0
    The characters are talking animals
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this story was written for children? The story is set in a forest. The battle was won by a ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers