Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

Question

Aniya Dominguez

English

17 December, 01:05

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Benjamin Case · Answer 1

The characters are talking animals. Any other option would be logical and easy to explain, but talking animals don't exist unless you consider a parrot. Nonetheless, the other options are logical and realistic while the last option is not at all realistic. Most children's books are not realistic.

Batman · Answer 2

The characters are talking animals

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that thisstory was written for children?The story is set in a forest.The battle was won by a trick.The excerpt describes a battle.The characters are talking animals.

Which evidence best supports the conclusion that this

story was written for children?

The story is set in a forest.

The battle was won by a trick.

The excerpt describes a battle.

The characters are talking animals.