In her article "Why Should I Vote?" Stephanie Goggin crafts a well-organized and coherent argument. She states that every person of voting age who is registered should vote. She also argues that if you are not registered to vote, you should be. In conclusion, Goggin's argument is laid out in a thoughtful and thorough way that is convincing to readers.

Question

Knapp

English

26 November, 00:14

In her article "Why Should I Vote?" Stephanie Goggin crafts a well-organized and coherent argument. She states that every person of voting age who is registered should vote. She also argues that if you are not registered to vote, you should be. In conclusion, Goggin's argument is laid out in a thoughtful and thorough way that is convincing to readers.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Alivia Church · Answer 1

Evaluation of evidence

Explanation:

According to a different source, this is the information that is missing from this question:

Which element is missing from this evaluation?

summary of the claim thesis statement concluding statement evaluation of evidence

In this evaluation, the author makes a summary of the claim, as she explains what it is that Goggin is defending in her essay. She also creates a thesis statement by arguing that Goggin's arguments are organized and coherent. Finally, she includes a concluding statement that starts with the words "in conclusion." However, the author fails to include an evaluation of evidence.