Do you think that John Muir made an affective argument for saving the redwoods? Why or why not?

John Muir makes an effective argument for saving the redwoods. He appeals to logic by giving evidence about the destruction. He seems very credible because he knows about the history of individual trees. Finally, he makes readers want to save the trees by using strong emotional language throughout.

Explanation:

I just took the test.

Yes, he did mostly because he was first hand experiencing the trees getting cut down himself.