Ask Question
1 November, 02:05

In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefiting the community, including the Children's Story Hour.

Which is a piece of relevant evidence in support of Joshua's claim and reasoning?

A: Without Story Hour, the kids will be getting more TV and less literature.

B: The annual circulation of the library is. 5 million volumes. That statistic means that the residents of our city borrowed approximately a half million volumes.

C: Over the years, sitting in a circle with many other children, I must have listened to dozens of wonderful stories and poems.

D: I began attending these weekly events even before I was able to read; I was three or four years old, according to my mother.

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 1 November, 02:07
    0
    I believe it would be a
  2. 1 November, 02:10
    0
    A would be the most relevant because it shows a negative consequence to getting rid of Children's Story Hour.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In "Say No to Budget Cuts," Joshua argues that budget cuts will eliminate many services benefiting the community, including the Children's ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers