In general, readers today have a better understanding of science than readers in 1898. How would the tone of the passage's narrator have affected readers in 1898 versus readers today?
A. It would have seemed more insulting, since the narrator seems to belittle the readers.
B. It would have seemed more frightening, since the narrator is so knowledgeable about science.
C. It would have seemed far too complicated to understand.
D. It would have seemed more credible, since the narrator speaks with scientific authority.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In general, readers today have a better understanding of science than readers in 1898. How would the tone of the passage's narrator have ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Gregorian chants developed because pope Gregory I wanted to standardize masses
Answers (1)
Tempted by the delicious-looking chocolate, the diet went out the window. Which revision most effectively corrects the dangling modifier in the sentence? Tempted, the delicious-looking chocolate made the diet go out the window.
Answers (1)
Benjamin Franklin's Poor Richard's Almanac is a collection of?
Answers (1)
How did Paul die in the rocking horse
Answers (1)
Based on what is happening in this part of the poem, the repeated "s" sound most likely relates to
Answers (1)
New Questions in English
In order to effectively prove your thesis, you must: provide
Answers (1)
How can a moderator set clear goals in a discussion
Answers (1)
Why cant people use the N-word
Answers (1)
In what ways is the death of Duncan affecting the Macbeth's? Act 3 scene 2
Answers (1)
What might the significance be of liesel dreaming of adolf hitler? - the book thief
Answers (1)