Which of these details supports the supporting idea of the third section?

supporting idea: to understand the importance of a fair trial in the united states, a person should know what trials are like in other countries?

its the one that says something about china's convicted rates and united states

Explanation:

i did this lesson and i got it right, also it makes sense since it proves that in other countries, the right to a fair trial isn't always as fair and some governments are very flawed.

by giving details about the effects of unfair trials in

countries other than the United States

by giving examples of the changes that have taken place

in the Chinese legal system

by explaining how having different numbers of people on

a jury can affect a fair trial

by comparing and contrasting trials in the United States

to trials in other countries

by giving details about the effects of unfair trials in

countries other than the United States

Answer: Option A.

Explanation:

In the paragraph, the author explains how the trials work in other countries but there is no comparison made with other countries to the United States because the trial working in the United States is not explained.

So therefore there can not be any comparison made. If the way the trial works in the United States, then a comparison can be made of working of fair trials of different countries with the United States.