What reasons can Hannah use to support her claim? Select two options.

The danger is that protection will turn into censorship, eroding our constitutional right to freedom of speech.

a) The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear.

Internet service providers only provide internet access; they have nothing to do with content.

b) Social media offer platforms where predators can stalk people and even gain control over them.

c) By refusing to monitor content, we are unleashing criminals such as hate groups and predators.

d) It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

Question

Alissa Grant

English

1 April, 17:22

What reasons can Hannah use to support her claim? Select two options.

The danger is that protection will turn into censorship, eroding our constitutional right to freedom of speech.

a) The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear.

Internet service providers only provide internet access; they have nothing to do with content.

b) Social media offer platforms where predators can stalk people and even gain control over them.

c) By refusing to monitor content, we are unleashing criminals such as hate groups and predators.

d) It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Jaylen · Answer 1

The correct answer is option A

Explanation:

In the above situation where Hannah wants to support her claim about freedom of speech on internet forums. She is afraid that if the protection will turn into censorship of content which will completely ruin the purpose of internet, thus taking away freedom of speech.

The claim that internet providers are only supposed to provide internet services and should have nothing to do with the kind of content they are provided with can favor her argument.

Konner Stevens · Answer 2

A). The internet is one place people can speak their minds without fear.

D). It is impossible to know whether the people we entrust with the job of judging online content will act in our best interests.

Explanation:

To persuade or convince the audience to believe in your ideas, substantiating the claims becomes a must as it establishes the credibility of the author that further aids to convince the audience. In the given question, Hannah could substantiate her claim that protection must not convert into censorship as it would crumble the people's right to speech. The first option proposes a description regarding the role of internet in our life as it is the common platform where people can express themselves while option fourth interrogates the credibility of the authorities that may turn protection into censorship as it may not be in the interests of the people. Thus, option A and D both backs Hannah's claim.