How do the authors use historical evidence to support

their claim?

They use secondary sources to show how French

and English monarchs were indifferent to enslaved

people.

They use secondary sources to show that enslaved

people often fought for their freedom after arriving in

the Caribbean.

They use facts from primary sources to show how

countries increased the number of enslaved people

to produce more sugar.

They use primary source interviews to show that

countries could make more money in trading sugar

without using enslaved people.

The answer is "c"

Question

Kathy Bryan

English

8 April, 12:11

How do the authors use historical evidence to support

their claim?

They use secondary sources to show how French

and English monarchs were indifferent to enslaved

people.

They use secondary sources to show that enslaved

people often fought for their freedom after arriving in

the Caribbean.

They use facts from primary sources to show how

countries increased the number of enslaved people

to produce more sugar.

They use primary source interviews to show that

countries could make more money in trading sugar

without using enslaved people.

The answer is "c"

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Lilyana Hickman · Answer 1

Lilyana Hickman 8 April, 12:14

0

Answer: C

Explanation:

Took test

Jabari Zavala · Answer 2

Answer: C) They use facts from primary sources to show how countries increased the number of enslaved people to produce more sugar.

Explanation: The authors explain with statistical data (a primary source) that the French found an opportunity to produce money out of making sugar, and turned many of the places they owned into their sugar colonies. Exploiting then, the enslaved people as well as the English monarchs did.