Ask Question
16 September, 04:57

In an argument about random drug testing for students, your opponent argues that schools should respect a student's privacy and not randomly test for drugs. Which statement would best refute this argument? We must protect our teenagers and current methods of cutting off drugs at the source are not working. Discouraging drug use among athletes will discourage it among the rest of the student body. Urine, hair, and breath samples can be used to test for the use of many common drugs. To enforce random drug testing is to view students as guilty until proven innocent, going against our Constitutional rights.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 16 September, 05:25
    0
    A ... We must protect our teenagers and current methods of cutting off drugs at the source are not working.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In an argument about random drug testing for students, your opponent argues that schools should respect a student's privacy and not ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers