Ask Question
7 June, 10:38

When Justice Fortas refers to Keyishian v. Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, which kind of reasoning is he using to support his argument?

A. Precedent

B. Pathos

C. Judicial Review

D. Straw man

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 7 June, 10:40
    0
    A. Precedent M8. checkm8
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When Justice Fortas refers to Keyishian v. Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, which kind of reasoning is he ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers