Ask Question
9 September, 05:19

Read the claim, related reason, and evidence a student wrote about "The Most Dangerous Game." Claim: Rainsford should not kill Zaroff. Reason: Rainsford believes that men should not hunt other men. Evidence: "Surely your experiences in the war-" "Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder," finished Rainsford stiffly. Which explanation best states how the evidence supports the student's reason? Killing a man compromises Rainsford's beliefs. Killing Zaroff will not end the hunting game. Killing prey will prove Rainsford's skills. Killing a general is a declaration of war.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 9 September, 05:36
    0
    The answer is A - Killing a man compromises Rainsford’s beliefs.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Read the claim, related reason, and evidence a student wrote about "The Most Dangerous Game." Claim: Rainsford should not kill Zaroff. ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers