What was the effect of Tolkien's decision to set The Hobbit in Middle-earth rather than a real place?

The setting allowed him to write about characters who had flaws and did not always do the right thing.

The setting allowed him to give his novel a happy ending rather than a tragic one.

The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods.

The setting allowed him to write about a heroic figure who goes on a quest.

Question

Sheldon Jones

English

7 June, 13:27

What was the effect of Tolkien's decision to set The Hobbit in Middle-earth rather than a real place?

The setting allowed him to write about characters who had flaws and did not always do the right thing.

The setting allowed him to give his novel a happy ending rather than a tragic one.

The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods.

The setting allowed him to write about a heroic figure who goes on a quest.

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Joaquin Hull · Answer 1

The effect of Tolkien's decision to set The Hobbit in the Middle-earth rather than a real place is that The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods.

Explanation:

One of the main objectives of J. R. R. Tolkien, while he was writing not only the hobbit but all the series of books and stories around these characters, was to create mythology that would eventually become part of British culture, having the character in Middle-earth gave him all the freedom that allowed the creation of many fantastic fictional characters as well as a language.

Robert · Answer 2

Answer: The setting allowed him to invent all different kinds of imaginary creatures, myths, and gods. Middle Earth gave him much liberty and he could create practically everything from scratch. A real place would resrtict him in many ways and the story would not look nearly as magical.