Allen discriminates or distinguishes between what people should do and what they should be allowed to do. How does he reconcile this apparent contradiction in his argument?

Here is the answer of the given question above. Based on the given situation above about Allen, who discriminates or distinguishes between what people should do and what they should be allowed to do is that, he reconciles this apparent contradiction in his argument by calling for human decency and respect. But he doesn't want that legislated.