Ask Question
2 October, 16:51

Prompt: Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford's final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified.

Which could serve as claims for a paragraph written in response to the prompt? Check all that apply.

1. Rainsford's final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified because of

Zaroff's actions.

2. Rainsford is forced to play what Zaroff calls the "most dangerous game," to hunt-man.

3. By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game."

4. Rainsford has committed murder, which is not a game.

5. Murder is not something that can be justified

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 2 October, 17:00
    0
    1st one: Rainsford's final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified because of Zaroff's actions.

    3rd one: By his own standards, Rainsford is not justified in killing Zaroff in "The Most Dangerous Game."
  2. 2 October, 17:15
    0
    Answer: 2

    Explanation: I believe the answer is two because Rainsford is forced to play his game, which makes it justified.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Prompt: Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford's final action in "The Most Dangerous Game" is justified. Which could ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers