Ask Question
23 March, 10:10

Imoku01 ik u stalking me but this is also a real question

Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?

Question 1 options:

Animals do not have time to adapt.

Animals always die.

Animals always move away and leave the ecosystem with less biodiversity.

All of the above.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 23 March, 10:37
    0
    Answer:A.

    Explanation: In a long-term process they have time to adapt and multiply, but in a short term they wont be able to and they will cease to exists.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Imoku01 ik u stalking me but this is also a real question Why is a short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a ...” in 📗 Geography if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers