Ask Question
27 April, 04:34

I have a debate tomorrow about invasive species of the Great Lakes. I need to make arrangements that states that we do not need to remove anymore invasive species because we have done enough. The only argument that I can think of is that chemicals that is used for removing them is toxic to humans. Any more suggest for the arguments?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 27 April, 04:36
    0
    You may add the cost will outgrown the actual thing being done.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “I have a debate tomorrow about invasive species of the Great Lakes. I need to make arrangements that states that we do not need to remove ...” in 📗 Geography if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers