Ask Question
30 March, 17:33

In contrast to a country with a primate city, a country whose cities follow the rank size rule is more likely to have-

a. wealth concentrated in urban areasb. fewer cultural centersc. more equality between urban and rural living standardsd. unequal living standards between larger and smaller citiese. a smaller overall population

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 30 March, 18:02
    0
    Option C: more equality between urban and rural living standards

    Explanation:

    In most countries with primate cities, there is a great imbalance in development. The biggest city may hold a great share of the country's entire population, about 35 - 45%.

    On the contrary, countries who follow the rank-size rule, have more balanced cities, with great populations and levels of development. This increases the living standards in both rural and urban regions because people from rural areas don't need to go to one big city to get employment, opportunities, education, etc.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In contrast to a country with a primate city, a country whose cities follow the rank size rule is more likely to have- a. wealth ...” in 📗 Geography if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers