Which of the following was a benefit of using heavy artillery instead of machine guns?

A:Heavy artillery fired more rounds. B:Heavy artillery fired rounds farther. C:Heavy artillery required fewer soldiers. D: Heavy artillery required less time to prepare.

Question

Shayla Cantu

History

10 September, 06:12

Which of the following was a benefit of using heavy artillery instead of machine guns?

A:Heavy artillery fired more rounds. B:Heavy artillery fired rounds farther. C:Heavy artillery required fewer soldiers. D: Heavy artillery required less time to prepare.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Reece Robles · Answer 1

One of the benefit in using heavy artillery instead of machine guns is B, heavy artillery fired rounds farther. Some of its advantages are long-ranged guns were essentially secure from everything except for other long-run firearms, they could be kept a long way from the bleeding edge and it likewise had a higher gauge and along these lines heavier payloads.

Which of the following was a benefit of using heavy artillery instead of machine guns?A:Heavy artillery fired more rounds. B:Heavy artillery fired rounds farther. C:Heavy artillery required fewer soldiers. D: Heavy artillery required less time to prepare.

Which of the following was a benefit of using heavy artillery instead of machine guns?

A:Heavy artillery fired more rounds. B:Heavy artillery fired rounds farther. C:Heavy artillery required fewer soldiers. D: Heavy artillery required less time to prepare.