Why is it necessary for a historian to be sure of the authenticity of a primary source? a. to make sure that the source is free from bias b. to make sure that the source does not leave out important facts c. to make sure that the source can be used for historical research d. to make sure that the source was written by a famous person
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why is it necessary for a historian to be sure of the authenticity of a primary source? a. to make sure that the source is free from bias ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
A select individual from japanese feudal society, who was a warrior and was given land by the wealthy in exchange for protection, was known as a
Answers (1)
Why was Santa Anna angry at Mexico for supplying soldiers at the Alamo?
Answers (1)
In what way did the growth of lutherism and calvinism affect the cultural geography of europe
Answers (1)
What were two of the most controversial domestic issues facing Americans during the early part of the 1970s?
Answers (2)
What does Catherine Ross mean when she says that "freedom of expression is the engine oil that makes democracies function"?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Describe the differences between American system of government and the Divine Right of Kings
Answers (1)
Place the events from early Oklahoma history in chronological order. Great Britain wins the French and Indian War. Spain returns Louisiana to the French. France loses its lands in North America. The United States and Spain sign Pinckney's Treaty.
Answers (1)
Why did the delgates meet at the constutional convetion
Answers (1)
After magua took cora, who came out of the lodge divested of his attire and with the visage of a warrior?
Answers (1)
What is Norway's higher power? Who rules over Norway? Just a government or do they have royalty or?
Answers (1)