Ask Question
1 February, 17:55

Why is it necessary for a historian to be sure of the authenticity of a primary source? a. to make sure that the source is free from bias b. to make sure that the source does not leave out important facts c. to make sure that the source can be used for historical research d. to make sure that the source was written by a famous person

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 1 February, 18:17
    0
    C. to make sure that the source can be used for historical research
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why is it necessary for a historian to be sure of the authenticity of a primary source? a. to make sure that the source is free from bias ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers