How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act?

a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands.

b. tribes had no right to any land in the new territories.

c. tribes had to abide by the decisions of the united states.

d. tribes would receive rent from farmers using their land?

Question

30 June, 04:48

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Porky · Answer 1

A is the answer. They can stay on their lands but they don't hold any titles to those lands

Dillon · Answer 2

I believe the answer is c

How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act?a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands.b. tribes had no right to any land in the new territories.c. tribes had to abide by the decisions of the united states.d. tribes would receive rent from farmers using their land?