Ask Question
30 June, 04:48

How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act?

a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands.

b. tribes had no right to any land in the new territories.

c. tribes had to abide by the decisions of the united states.

d. tribes would receive rent from farmers using their land?

+3
Answers (2)
  1. 30 June, 05:09
    0
    A is the answer. They can stay on their lands but they don't hold any titles to those lands
  2. 30 June, 05:10
    0
    I believe the answer is c
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “How did the supreme court interpret the indian removal act? a. tribes could choose to remain on their lands. b. tribes had no right to any ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers