Critics of presidentialism have argued that many political crises confronted by Latin American countries could have been avoided or resolved less painfully if a parliamentary system had been in place. Examples include that fall of democracy in Chile in the early 1970s and in Venezuela after 2015. Explain this argument. Why was presidentialism, presumably, a stumbling block to resolving these crises
+3
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Critics of presidentialism have argued that many political crises confronted by Latin American countries could have been avoided or ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Home » History » Critics of presidentialism have argued that many political crises confronted by Latin American countries could have been avoided or resolved less painfully if a parliamentary system had been in place.