Ask Question
17 May, 12:13

What's one major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the civil war?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 17 May, 12:27
    0
    Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War

    Historians say that he had an unbalanced intellectual history, since he offered a level of patience to the pro-slavery ideologies that he does not award to the anti-slavery movement. Abolitionists were everything from abusive to humanitarians, according to Potter.

    Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War

    Holt, on the other hand, was a professor so he provided a more lucid interpretation of the Civil War, as a matter of fact, Holt sees the conflict as a breakdown in America's democratic political process. No longer differences had to be resolved within the arena of battle, according to him.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “What's one major difference between Potter's and Holt's historical interpretations of the civil war? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers