If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicing

a. judicial activism.

b. judicial restraint.

c. original jurisdiction.

d. appellate jurisdiction.

Question

Guest

History

22 July, 22:04

If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicing

a. judicial activism.

b. judicial restraint.

c. original jurisdiction.

d. appellate jurisdiction.

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jerome Simmons · Answer 1

If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicing "judicial restraint," since he or she is not letting her personal feeling get in the way of upholding the law.

If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicinga. judicial activism.b. judicial restraint.c. original jurisdiction.d. appellate jurisdiction.

If a Supreme Court judge has personal religious objections to military service, but rules in favor of the draft because it is a federal law, that judge is practicing

a. judicial activism.

b. judicial restraint.

c. original jurisdiction.

d. appellate jurisdiction.