Lars is completing a history project about World War I. On the British government's National Archives website, he finds letters from American soldiers as well as documents written by museum curators and historians that give background information about the war, supported by primary sources from their archives' collections. Which descriptions best characterize this information? Select three options. outdated facts credible sources primary sources biased information reasoned judgment

You can assume the source is credible. No one would write to someone while engaging in a war if they were not prepared to state what they wanted to say truthfully. The current letter might be the only one the family gets.

A letter is normally a primary source. A commentary on the letter is generally a secondary source.

The third one is kind of tough. It can be biased. It can be reasoned (it should be).

The third choice is reasoned I guess, but sometimes people wrote very emotionally. We are not Star Trek Vulcans.

Credible sources

primary sources

biased information