Ask Question
27 December, 15:28

How was England different than the absolute monarchies of both France and Russia during this time period?

a England was ruled solely by a legislative body, while France and Russia remained in control of the monarch

b England became a constitutional monarchy, while France and Russia maintained an absolute monarchy

c England refused to adopt a bill of rights, while France and Russia added these to their constitutions

d there were no differences

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 27 December, 15:33
    0
    The correct answer is B) England became a constitutional monarchy, while France and Russia maintained an absolute monarchy.

    Explanation:

    England had gone through a liberal revolution and it was no longer an absolute monarchy. Unlike other countries in Europe, England was ruled by a Monarch with limited powers and there was always a check on what they can do.

    A constitution clearly laid down the power of the Monarch and those powers could not be exceeded. The British parliament jealously ensured the limited powers of the Monarch.

    However, countries such as France and Russia were completely in control of the Monarch with absolute power in the country.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “How was England different than the absolute monarchies of both France and Russia during this time period? a England was ruled solely by a ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers