Ask Question
16 January, 01:48

A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states must not interfere with commerce between individuals. must apply national law to commerce within their borders. could prohibit any commerce within their borders. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 16 January, 02:02
    0
    A result of the Gibbo V. Ogden (1824) decision was that state could regulate commerce only within their borders. This was a landmark decision in which united state supreme that held the power to regulate interstate commerce. The landmark was considered decision with ripple effect that lasted for 1000 years.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states must not interfere with commerce between individuals. must apply national ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers