What was the long-term economic effect of the Punic Wars on Rome?
A: The loss of territory drained Roman funds.
B: Payments to the army bankrupted the Romans.
C: The end of slave labor cost farmers greatly.
D: The conquests brought great power and wealth to the Romans.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “What was the long-term economic effect of the Punic Wars on Rome? A: The loss of territory drained Roman funds. B: Payments to the army ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How did the railroads revolutionize industry and business in the late 1800s? Businesses were able to expand their operations and reach new markets. The growth of the railroads made transportation by ships obsolete.
Answers (1)
A British law placed a high tax on sugar and molasses
Answers (2)
The Shona tribe were in: A: South Africa B: Zambia C:Zimbabwe D:Tanzania
Answers (1)
What questions should I ask Andrew Jackson if I were to interview him about his presidency?
Answers (1)
What is a possible reason for the cause of bigfoot?
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
Dissenters occupied which less prosperous area in virginia?
Answers (1)
Florida was readmitted to the Union in 1868 after the state wrote a new constitution protecting the rights of former enslaved persons. held new elections and chose several African Americans to serve.
Answers (2)
How did the assembly line and divison of labor affect manufacturing?
Answers (2)
2. Who were the parents of the legendary king Minos?
Answers (2)
The chief goal of fifteenth-century portuguese expansion was:
Answers (1)