Which correctly detail the arguments on both sides of the global warming debate?

Select all that apply.

Supporters believe the burning of rain forests raises temperatures. Critics claim the farmland is more valuable.

Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions. Critics claim that it would hamper economic growth.

Supporters accuse critics of using false claims to gain control. Critics accuse supporters of protecting big business.

Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon. Critics maintain that the earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle.

Question

Raul

History

14 May, 21:07

Which correctly detail the arguments on both sides of the global warming debate?

Select all that apply.

Supporters believe the burning of rain forests raises temperatures. Critics claim the farmland is more valuable.

Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions. Critics claim that it would hamper economic growth.

Supporters accuse critics of using false claims to gain control. Critics accuse supporters of protecting big business.

Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon. Critics maintain that the earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Tate Macdonald · Answer 1

The correct options are: B and D

"Supporters demand immediate action to decrease CO2 emissions. Critics claim that it would hamper economic growth. "

"Supporters say humans need to correct the problem soon. Critics maintain that the earth is simply experiencing a natural cycle. "

Explanation:

A large majority of carbon dioxide emissions are a result of fossil fuel burning to generate electricity to power entire cities, countries. And the economy does heavily depend on these resources to drive its growth. Hence, green alternatives need to be looked into and invested in, ones that make use of renewable energy sources to generate electricity.