Which of the following best explains the U. S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore?

It decided that FloridaÍs first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner.

It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.

It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution.

It decided that FloridaÍs first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.

Question

Serena

History

1 April, 07:18

Which of the following best explains the U. S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore?

It decided that FloridaÍs first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner.

It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.

It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution.

It decided that FloridaÍs first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Alejandro Randall · Answer 1

The statement that best explains the U. S Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore is it decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner. The correct answer is B.